In the Prologue to The Inconvenient Indian, Thomas King explains how his understanding of his project changed as he was writing the book. Its original working subtitle was A Curious History of Native People in North America, but his wife and son, both historians, convinced him that calling the book a “history” would oblige him to follow scholarly conventions and to adhere to a “delineated chronology.” For King, a novelist, this “delineated chronology” does not accurately reflect how humans experience history. Quoting the poet and critic Ezra Pound, he says:

We do NOT know the past in chronological sequence. It may be convenient to lay it out anaesthetized on the table with dates pasted on here and there, but what we know we know by ripples and spirals eddying out from us and from our own time (x).

Pound’s understanding of history, then, is not that of the historian but that of the storyteller, and as such it aligns with King’s perspective as a novelist. The book’s final, published subtitle is A Curious Account of Native People in North America. The seemingly trivial difference between history and account functions as a mission statement for the book, as King sets out to write not an authoritative, chronological history but a story—one that narrates the past from the vantage point of the present and from the singular perspective of its author.