42 pages 1 hour read

Sally Walker

Written in Bone: Buried Lives of Jamestown and Colonial Maryland

Nonfiction | Book | Middle Grade | Published in 2009

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides that feature detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, quotes, and essay topics.

Important Quotes

Quotation Mark Icon

“Once again, I wondered: Who were these people? What were their lives like?”


(Note to Reader, Page 7)

Walker begins the book with questions that drive her narrative—in particular, that of the Daily Lives of American Colonists. She aims to present the book’s subjects not as bones in the ground but as real people who lived full lives. Establishing a human connection also prompts the reader to consider the significance of the archaeological work being done, bridging the gap between science and humanity.

Quotation Mark Icon

“As they find, excavate, and analyze these objects—including skeletons—archaeologists help us understand the past more fully and reclaim the histories of individuals who had been forgotten with the passage of time.”


(Chapter 1, Page 9)

Establishing the importance of Connecting the Historical Record to Archaeological Evidence, Walker contends that archaeologists play an active role in uncovering and preserving history through their meticulous work. This process not only fills gaps in the historical record but also brings to light the lived experiences of individuals who either did not or could not leave behind written accounts. By uncovering and interpreting physical remnants, archaeologists contribute to a more nuanced and complete understanding of history, ensuring that the contributions and stories of all people are acknowledged and preserved.

Quotation Mark Icon

“Jamestown quickly outgrew the area of James Fort. The materials used in the fort’s construction were removed and used for other building projects.”


(Chapter 1, Page 12)

The removal and reuse of construction materials meant that physical evidence of the fort’s existence was fragmented and dispersed, complicating efforts to piece together an accurate historical narrative. This made the task of archaeologists more difficult, as they had to rely on fewer and often scattered clues to understand the original layout and functions of key sites.